Call or WhatsApp +91 96259 61599 advocates@legals365.com Commercial courts in Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad and Gurugram
Commercial Court Lawyer, B.K. Singh & Associates, Delhi NCR

Temporary injunctions under Order XXXIX, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, read with the Specific Relief Act, 1963

Urgent Injunction to Stop Harm to Your Business

How to get an urgent interim injunction in a Delhi NCR commercial court under Order 39 CPC: the three tests, orders without notice, documents, time and costs.

In short. An interim injunction is a court order that stops the other side from doing something harmful while your commercial suit is pending. Think of a rival selling under your brand, a buyer about to sell disputed goods, an ex-employee using your data, or a supplier cutting you off in breach of contract. It's meant for harm that is real, close and won't be cured by money paid years later. If the urgency is genuine, the court can hear you the day you file. Sometimes before the other side even knows. So collect the contract, the threat in writing and proof of loss, and file before the damage lands.

सारांश (हिंदी में)इंटरिम इंजंक्शन कोर्ट का ऐसा ऑर्डर है जो केस चलने तक सामने वाले को नुकसान वाला काम करने से रोक देता है। जैसे कोई आपके ब्रांड की नकल कर रहा है, झगड़े वाला माल बेचने जा रहा है, आपका डेटा इस्तेमाल कर रहा है, या कॉन्ट्रैक्ट तोड़कर आपको बाहर कर रहा है। यह तब काम आता है जब नुकसान अभी हो रहा है और बाद में पैसा मिल भी जाए तो उसकी भरपाई नहीं होगी। मामला सच में अर्जेंट हो तो कोर्ट उसी दिन सुन लेता है, कई बार सामने वाले को बताए बिना भी। अभी कॉन्ट्रैक्ट, धमकी वाला लेटर या नोटिस, और नुकसान के सबूत इकट्ठा कर लीजिए, और नुकसान होने से पहले केस फाइल कीजिए।

Is this your situation?

  • A rival has started selling in packaging so close to yours that a retailer in Karol Bagh rang to ask if you'd launched a new line.
  • Your distributor agreement has two years left on it, and a termination email arrived on a Friday evening, effective immediately.
  • A sales manager left last month. Now your clients are getting calls that quote your own price list back to them.
  • The goods you say are yours are sitting in the other side's godown, and you've heard they're being loaded onto trucks.
  • Your landlord has threatened to put a lock on the shop and has already had the electricity cut once.
  • A co-promoter is quietly lining up a share transfer that your shareholders' agreement doesn't allow.
  • Whatever is going to happen will happen in days. Not months.

What an interim injunction is, and when a commercial court will give one

An interim injunction is a temporary order. It either freezes things as they are or stops one particular act until the suit is decided. It isn't the final verdict. All the court is saying is that this harm shouldn't happen while it works out who is right. The power sits in Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), and the broader principles come from Sections 36 to 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

Rule 1 is about property. It applies where the disputed property might be wasted, damaged or sold, where the defendant is threatening to remove or dispose of property to defeat creditors, or where you're about to be thrown out of possession. Rule 2 is about breach of contract and other injury, and lets the court stop the defendant from repeating or carrying on a breach. Most business injunctions are filed under Rule 2. We add Rule 1 when goods or premises are involved.

There are two stages, and people mix them up all the time. An ad interim injunction is the stop-gap order, often given at the very first hearing and usually for a few weeks, until the court has heard both sides. The interim injunction proper comes later, once the defendant has replied and the application has been argued. In practice, a lot of disputes are really decided by the ad interim order. Once the court freezes the position, the other side tends to pick up the phone.

An injunction only ever comes as support for a suit. You can't file a bare application and leave it there. The plaint has to ask for final relief (usually a permanent injunction, often damages or recovery of money as well), and the interim application rides on that plaint.

The law you'd be relying on

Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2, CPC

These let the court grant temporary injunctions to protect disputed property and to stop a breach of contract or other injury while the suit runs. It can put conditions on the order too. Keep accounts, say, or furnish security, or deposit money in court.

Order XXXIX Rule 2A, CPC

Disobey an injunction and the court can attach your property and send you to civil prison for up to three months. That's what gives the order its bite. It's also why most defendants comply.

Order XXXIX Rules 3 and 3A, CPC

An order without notice (ex parte, meaning the other side isn't there) is allowed only where delay would defeat the purpose, and the court has to record why. The moment you get one, you must send the defendant the application, affidavit, plaint and documents, and file an affidavit saying you've done it. Under Rule 3A, the court should try to finally decide the application within thirty days of an ex parte order.

Order XXXIX Rule 4, CPC

The defendant can ask the court to vacate, vary or set aside the order. If you got it through a false or misleading statement, that alone is enough for the court to vacate it.

Sections 14, 20A and 41, Specific Relief Act, 1963

Section 41 lists the cases where no injunction can be granted. One of them is stopping the breach of a contract that wouldn't be specifically enforced. Section 14(d) says a contract that's determinable by its nature (one either side can end on notice) isn't specifically enforced. And since 2018, Section 20A and Section 41(ha) bar injunctions in suits about infrastructure projects where the order would delay or impede the project.

Section 12A, Commercial Courts Act, 2015

Pre-institution mediation is compulsory, except where the suit contemplates urgent interim relief. A genuine injunction suit is the main exception. But the court reads the plaint to check the urgency is real.

Section 13(1A), Commercial Courts Act, read with Order XLIII, CPC

You can appeal an order that grants or refuses a temporary injunction. In a commercial suit it goes to the Commercial Appellate Court or the Commercial Appellate Division of the High Court, within 60 days.

The three tests a judge applies

Every injunction application is judged on three questions the Supreme Court has settled over decades. First, a prima facie case. You need a serious, arguable claim on the papers, not proof beyond doubt. Second, the balance of convenience, which really asks who gets hurt more if the court wrongly grants or wrongly refuses the order. Third, irreparable injury. That's harm money can't properly repair later.

The third test is where most business applications fall over. If your loss is a clean sum of money, the court will usually say you can be paid later with interest, and that it needn't step in now. Lost goodwill is different. So are confused customers, leaked confidential data, losing a premises you can't replace, or disputed goods being destroyed. Those are hard to put a number on, and courts take them seriously.

When Advocate B.K. Singh picks up an injunction brief, he looks first for one date. When did the client first learn of the threat? Delay quietly kills these applications. If you knew about a copycat brand for eight months and now want an order within 24 hours, the judge will ask, quite fairly, what changed. Where there was delay, the plaint should explain it honestly. Maybe you were waiting on a reply to your notice, or negotiating, or setting up a test purchase. Say so.

Courts also want clean hands. You disclose earlier letters, earlier cases and anything that hurts you. That isn't optional. Hide a material document to get an order and it'll often be vacated at the next hearing, with costs on top.

Where businesses usually ask for one

  • Someone's copying your brand or packaging. That's infringement of a registered trade mark, or passing off if the mark isn't registered. These suits almost always open with an injunction application; our page on trademark infringement and passing off goes into it.
  • Your client list or code has walked out of the door. An ex-employee, ex-partner or vendor is using your pricing, your customers or your source code. The court can stop the use and order the material returned. There's more on protecting confidential information.
  • Your distributorship or franchise has been cut off. Judges tread carefully here, because plenty of these contracts can be ended on notice. You're more likely to get protection for stock, for exclusivity during the notice period, or for use of shared marks. See franchise and distributor disputes.
  • The landlord wants you out of the shop or office. Threats of forcible eviction, sealing, or cutting power to premises you trade from. A lease of property used only for trade is a commercial dispute; see shop and office lease disputes.
  • Shares or company assets are being moved. Shares transferred in breach of a right of first refusal, or a co-promoter shifting assets out. Enforcing the contract stays with the civil court. Oppression and mismanagement claims go to the NCLT.
  • Goods are in dispute. A buyer threatening to sell or use up goods whose ownership is contested. Or a transporter or warehouse that simply won't release the cargo.

Can I get an injunction without telling the other side?

Yes. But only where telling them would defeat the point. Goods that would be sold before the hearing, data that would be wiped, counterfeit stock that would disappear overnight. The court grants an ex parte order only on a sworn affidavit, records its reasons, and usually keeps the order short.

What you pay for it is strict compliance. Order XXXIX Rule 3 says that straight after the order you must deliver to the defendant, or send by registered post, a copy of the application, the supporting affidavit, the plaint and the documents you rely on. Then you file an affidavit of compliance the same day or the next. Courts have vacated ex parte injunctions for nothing more than skipping this. We keep the compliance set ready before the matter is even listed.

A defendant who sees a suit coming will often file a caveat under Section 148A CPC. It lasts 90 days and means they get notice before any order is passed. If there's a caveat on record, you serve the caveator before the hearing and the court hears them first. So check for one, at the filing counter or on the e-filing portal, as part of getting ready.

Even after notice, you can still get an ad interim order on day one. That happens when the defendant doesn't turn up. Or can't give a good reason against it.

Do I still need Section 12A mediation first?

Not if your suit genuinely needs urgent interim relief. Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 makes pre-institution mediation compulsory for commercial suits, but it carves out suits that contemplate urgent interim relief. In Patil Automation v. Rakheja Engineers (2022), the Supreme Court held mediation mandatory for suits filed from 20 August 2022. A plaint filed without it can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11.

Then came Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D. Keerthi (2023). The Supreme Court said the court will look at the plaint, the documents and the facts to decide whether the urgency is real. An injunction prayer tacked on just to dodge mediation won't work. If you're asking to stop conduct that ended a year ago, or the case is really only about money, you're exposed.

So we decide this before a word is drafted. Where the harm is ongoing or about to happen, we file straight away with the injunction application and a separate urgency paragraph in the plaint. Where the real fight is over payment and the injunction is a side issue, going to pre-institution mediation first is usually the safer bet. The mediation period doesn't count towards limitation. You lose no time.

How an urgent injunction case moves

This is how it usually runs in the Delhi district commercial courts, the Delhi High Court, and the commercial courts at Ghaziabad, Gautam Buddh Nagar, Gurugram and Faridabad. The steps don't change from court to court. How quickly a matter gets listed does.

  1. Pull the evidence together in a day or two

    The contract, the termination or threat letter, photographs or test purchases, dated screenshots, and something that shows your sales or goodwill. Electronic records will need a certificate under Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 later on. Keep the originals and their metadata intact now.

  2. Settle the court, the value and the urgency

    Work out the specified value, the court with pecuniary jurisdiction and the court with territorial jurisdiction. Decide whether Section 12A applies. Check for a caveat. Check for an arbitration clause too, because if there is one the whole route changes.

  3. Draft the plaint and the application side by side

    A commercial plaint needs a statement of truth, a list of every document and an urgency paragraph. The injunction application is a separate document with its own affidavit. It should ask for something precise. What exactly must the defendant stop doing, and where?

  4. File, then mention for urgent listing

    In the Delhi High Court and most district courts, urgent fresh matters are e-filed and listed fast, sometimes the same day or the next working day. You should be able to tell the judge in two minutes why the court ought to act before hearing the other side.

  5. The first hearing

    The court issues summons and notice. It might grant an ad interim injunction, refuse one, or ask the defendant for an undertaking instead. Don't undervalue an undertaking. It's enforceable just like an injunction.

  6. Comply with Order XXXIX Rule 3

    If you got an ex parte order, serve the full set on the defendant at once and file the compliance affidavit. Many courts now accept service by email and messaging apps alongside registered post. Keep proof of every mode you used.

  7. Reply, rejoinder, arguments

    The defendant replies to the application, you file a rejoinder, and it's argued. The court then confirms the order, changes it or vacates it. Either side can appeal within 60 days.

After that, the written statement, document disclosure and case management hearing follow the normal commercial timetable. The injunction stays in force until it's vacated or the suit is decided.

Time and costs, stage by stage

StageWhat happensUsual timeCosts (no lawyer fees)
Getting readyEvidence, drafting, statement of truth, affidavits2 to 7 days when it's a real emergencyNotary, typing, certified copies, the cost of a test purchase
Section 12A mediationNot needed if urgent interim relief is genuinely soughtUp to 3 months, plus 2 more if extended, where it appliesLegal Services Authority mediation fee, usually small
Filing and first listingE-filing, scrutiny, urgent mentionSame day to about a weekCourt fee on the suit (ad valorem on any money claim, and on the value you put on the injunction relief) plus a small fixed fee for each application
Ad interim orderGranted, refused, or an undertaking recordedAt the first hearingProcess fee and service charges
Reply and argumentsReply, rejoinder, hearingCourts aim for 30 days after an ex parte order; 1 to 6 months is commonCosts can be imposed for adjournments
Appeal against the orderCommercial Appellate Court or DivisionFile within 60 days; heard in weeks or monthsCourt fee on the appeal under state law
Final decision of the suitPermanent injunction, damages, costsOften 1.5 to 3 years or longer, and courts vary a lotCosts follow the event under Section 35 CPC as amended

Which court: Delhi, UP or Haryana?

Start with value. It has to be a commercial dispute with a specified value of Rs 3 lakh or more. For a pure injunction, that value is the market value of the right you're protecting, as you estimate it in good faith under Section 12 of the Commercial Courts Act. Judges notice when a value has been pitched oddly low or high to land in a particular court. Claim damages as well, and that amount gets added.

In Delhi, commercial suits up to Rs 2 crore go to the District Judge (Commercial Court) at the district courts. Saket, Patiala House, Tis Hazari, Karkardooma, Rohini, Dwarka, Rouse Avenue. Above Rs 2 crore, you file on the original side of the Delhi High Court Commercial Division. There's been a proposal since late 2025 to raise the district court limit. Check where it stands before you file.

In UP and Haryana, the suit goes to whichever court is designated the Commercial Court for that district, such as Ghaziabad, Gautam Buddh Nagar (at Surajpur), Gurugram or Faridabad. Appeals lie to the Commercial Appellate Division of the Allahabad High Court or of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

On territory, the usual rule under Section 20 CPC is the place where the defendant lives or works, or where the cause of action arose. Trade mark suits are different. Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 lets the owner sue where it carries on business, and Section 62 of the Copyright Act, 1957 does the same for copyright. An exclusive jurisdiction clause in your contract will usually bind both of you. For the value and territory rules in full, see which commercial court will hear the case.

Papers you'll need for the application

In a commercial suit you must file every document in your power and possession with the plaint. That includes the ones that hurt you. Anything you hold back now may be shut out later.

The contract and the threat

  • The signed agreement, or the purchase orders and emails that together make up the contract
  • The termination letter, legal notice or written threat
  • Your reply, and everything that came after it
  • Any earlier settlement or undertaking between you

What shows the right is yours

  • Trade mark or copyright registration certificates, or proof of when you first used the mark
  • Invoices, catalogues and ads that show your use and your reputation
  • A board resolution or authority letter for whoever signs the plaint
  • The lease deed or allotment letter, if it's about premises

What shows the harm

  • The test purchase bill and photos of the copied product
  • Screenshots showing the URL and date, kept in original form
  • Complaints or confused calls from customers
  • Your sales before the conduct started, and after

Filing papers

  • Statement of truth and the affidavit under Order XI
  • Certificate under Section 63, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam for electronic records
  • Vakalatnama and the company's authorisation
  • Caveat search result and the Order XXXIX Rule 3 compliance set

What a court won't stop

Not every wrong gets an injunction. The Specific Relief Act spells out where courts won't grant one. Better to know that before you spend money.

The plainest case is a contract either side can end on notice. Say your distribution agreement lets either party terminate on 90 days' notice. The court will rarely make the other side keep dealing with you. Your remedy is usually damages for the notice period, or for wrongful termination. What the court might still protect is stock, deposits, customer data or brand use while things wind down.

Don't expect much against a bank guarantee either. Courts rarely stop a bank paying out on an unconditional guarantee. The settled exceptions are clear fraud that the bank knows of, or special circumstances that would cause irretrievable injustice. Contractors and suppliers often come in hoping for an order here. Most leave disappointed. And in infrastructure contracts, Section 20A and Section 41(ha) of the Specific Relief Act now bar injunctions that would hold up the project.

You also can't get an injunction to stop someone pursuing a criminal case, or to halt proceedings in a court that isn't subordinate to the one you've approached. Where the defendant can obviously pay and your loss is only financial, the court may say no and ask for security instead. That's closer to attachment before judgment than to an injunction.

If there's an arbitration clause in your contract

Then a civil suit is often the wrong road. File one anyway and the defendant can apply under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court will send the dispute to arbitration, and that usually ends the suit.

What you want instead is an application for interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, in the court with jurisdiction, before or during the arbitration. The tests look a lot like Order XXXIX. The procedure, timelines and court don't. Our network's arbitration practice site covers that route. If the clause only covers some of the disputes, or some parties never signed it, the answer turns on the facts. Work it out carefully before filing anything.

A pure IP claim is simpler. If a stranger is infringing your trade mark, there's no contract between you, and a commercial suit with an injunction application is the normal course.

Suppliers, distributors, startups, MSMEs and big companies: what changes

If you're a supplier or manufacturer, you usually want to stop a buyer selling goods it never paid for, or stop a former distributor trading on your name. Once title in the goods has passed, an injunction gets harder and the case tends to turn into a money claim. A clear retention-of-title clause makes a real difference.

Distributors and franchisees are more often the ones trying to stop a termination. Read the termination clause first. If it allows termination on notice, build the case around the notice period, getting the security deposit back and a buy-back of stock. Don't ask the court to restore the relationship.

Startups and tech firms mostly need orders protecting code, data and customers after a co-founder or senior employee walks out. A blanket non-compete after employment ends usually won't be enforced, since Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 makes restraints of trade void. Courts will protect information that's truly confidential, though, and stop solicitation built on it. Keep the prayer narrow.

MSMEs often have good cases and thin files. If you're a registered micro or small enterprise, keep the Udyam certificate, purchase orders and email trail ready anyway. The court looks at paper. It doesn't care how big you are. Large companies have the reverse problem. A judge may ask why a business that size can't simply be compensated in money, and you'll need a careful answer on why the harm can't be undone.

The law is the same across Delhi, UP and Haryana. Listing practice isn't, and nor is how fast a court takes up a fresh matter or how service gets done. The Delhi High Court usually lists faster than a crowded district court. Only suits above the Delhi pecuniary limit can go there, though.

Once you have the order: compliance, contempt, appeals

Serve the injunction properly and keep proof that you did. If the defendant breaks it, apply under Order XXXIX Rule 2A with evidence of the breach. Fresh test purchases, screenshots, witness affidavits. The court can attach the defendant's property and order civil detention for up to three months. Judges take breaches of their own orders seriously. They still want proof, not a hunch.

Sometimes goods, premises or a running business need an independent person holding them while the suit goes on. The court can then appoint a receiver under Order XL; see appointment of a court receiver. In IP cases, courts also send local commissioners to visit premises, list what's there and sometimes seal infringing stock.

Either side can appeal an order granting or refusing an injunction within 60 days under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act. Our page on appeals against commercial court orders explains the forum and procedure. Appeal courts usually step in only if the trial court ignored the settled tests or took a view no reasonable court could. And if the injunction is against you? Your options are a Rule 4 application to vacate, an appeal, or both, and the planning for defending a commercial suit starts on day one.

Invented example: a distributor cut off without notice

This is an invented example, not a real client. A Noida company has spent four years as the exclusive North India distributor for an imported kitchen appliance brand. The agreement runs to March 2027. It allows termination only for a material breach that stays uncured after 60 days' notice. One Friday in October 2026, the brand owner emails a termination letter effective at once, appoints a new distributor in Gurugram and tells retailers to stop ordering from the Noida company. The Noida company is sitting on stock worth Rs 1.4 crore. The brand owner holds its security deposit of Rs 50 lakh.

The company's lawyers read the contract first. No arbitration clause. Exclusive jurisdiction lies with the courts at Gautam Buddh Nagar. The termination clause needs notice and a chance to cure. Getting the whole distributorship back may be hard. But terminating at once, telling retailers, and appointing someone new inside the exclusive territory before the notice period ends are all arguable breaches. With damages and the deposit, the specified value comes to about Rs 2.3 crore.

On Monday the suit is filed in the commercial court for Gautam Buddh Nagar, with an urgency paragraph and an injunction application. The order sought is narrow. For the 60-day notice period, the brand owner mustn't appoint another distributor in the territory, mustn't tell retailers the plaintiff is no longer authorised, and mustn't adjust the deposit against disputed dues. At the first hearing the court issues notice and records the brand owner's undertaking, through counsel, to hold the position for three weeks. The parties then settle on a stock buy-back and refund of the deposit within two months. None of this predicts any real case. Every court decides on its own facts.

How businesses lose an injunction they could have had

  • Waiting too long. A month of angry emails back and forth can be exactly why the court sees no urgency. Send one firm notice. Then move.
  • Asking for something vague. A prayer to stop the defendant harming the plaintiff in any manner gets you nowhere. Name the act you want stopped, where it happens, and for how long.
  • Hiding the awkward email. If you once admitted a delay or agreed to a variation, file it and explain it. Suppression is the usual reason ex parte orders get vacated.
  • Getting Rule 3 compliance wrong. Serving late, or serving half the set, hands the defendant an easy way to get the order vacated.
  • Picking the wrong court or the wrong value. File in the wrong pecuniary or territorial court and the plaint comes back to you, and the urgency goes with it. Sort it out before drafting. Not at the filing counter.
  • Forgetting the arbitration clause. If it should have been a Section 9 application, you've burnt the first few weeks, and those matter most.

What to get done this week

  • Note down the date you first heard of the threat, and every step you've taken since.
  • Save emails, WhatsApp chats and web pages in their original form, with dates. Don't delete a thing.
  • If it's about goods or a brand, make a test purchase or take dated photos.
  • Dig out the signed contract and read the termination, jurisdiction and arbitration clauses.
  • Jot down a one-page note of your sales, customers and losses since this began.
  • Have a board resolution or authority letter ready for whoever is going to sign the plaint.
  • Don't sign any settlement, release or no-dues letter until you've taken advice.

Have the papers checked before you file

An injunction case is won or lost in the first week, and mostly on paper. How badly the other side behaved matters less than you'd think. What matters is whether your documents show a specific, ongoing harm that money can't fix, and show that you moved fast to stop it. Advocate B.K. Singh and Advocate Sadhna Singh usually start with the contract, the threat letter and the dates. Then they'll tell you plainly whether a court is likely to see urgency, or whether mediation or a money claim makes more sense.

Fees are discussed at the first meeting and put in writing, stage by stage. Court fees and other out-of-pocket costs are separate.

Want your contract and correspondence checked before you act, or an update on how courts are treating urgent relief under Section 12A? Send them to Advocate B.K. Singh's team through the contact page.

Frequently asked questions

How quickly can I get an injunction order in Delhi?

If the urgency is real and your papers are ready, a fresh commercial suit with an injunction application can be listed within a day or a few days in the Delhi High Court and most district commercial courts. The court may pass an ad interim order at the first hearing. No court promises a date. Your preparation is the part you control.

What's the difference between a stay order and an injunction?

People use the two words loosely. An injunction is directed at a party and tells it to do, or not do, something. A stay usually suspends a proceeding, or an order passed by a court or authority. Against another company in a business dispute, it's an injunction you ask for.

Can the court stop my distributor agreement from being terminated?

Only in narrow cases. If the contract can be ended on notice, Section 14(d) and Section 41 of the Specific Relief Act generally stop the court from forcing the relationship to carry on. It can still protect you during the notice period. It can also order your deposit returned or make arrangements for the stock.

Do I have to send a legal notice before asking for an injunction?

Not always. If a notice would tip the other side off, say with counterfeit stock that could vanish, you can file straight away. Otherwise a short, firm notice helps. It shows you tried to sort it out and they refused.

What if the other side ignores the injunction?

You apply under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC. Once disobedience is proved, the court can attach the defendant's property and order civil detention for up to three months. You'll need evidence of a breach after the order was served.

I'm a small business without a registered trade mark. Can I still get an injunction?

Yes. Passing off protects unregistered marks that have built up goodwill. Courts look at real use, sales and reputation. Bring invoices, advertising and other proof of use dating from before the defendant started.

If the injunction turns out to be wrong, will I have to pay the other side?

You might. The court can ask you for an undertaking or security as a condition of the order. Section 95 CPC allows compensation where an injunction was obtained on insufficient grounds. And costs generally go to whoever wins.

Can I file an injunction suit if the contract has an arbitration clause?

Usually you shouldn't. The proper route is a Section 9 application under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. If you file a suit anyway, the defendant can ask the court to refer the dispute to arbitration. Read the clause before choosing your route.

Talk to an advocate about your dispute

Send the invoices, the contract or the summons. We will tell you the deadline that matters and the next step.

Book Consultation Call +91 96259 61599
WhatsApp us